Skip to content
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore logo

California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog

Useful information for navigating legal challenges

Menu

HomeAboutMeet the TeamServicesResourcesContactSubscribe

The Litigation Landscape In An E-Discovery World

By Morin Jacob on May 10, 2011
Posted in E-Discovery, Litigation, Privacy, Workplace Policies

flash-drive.jpgThe “e-discovery” amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were implemented in December 2006.  In 2009, California enacted similar “e-discovery” rules.  The adoption of these rules has greatly impacted the landscape for entities that find themselves in litigation in state or federal court.  There is an issue, for example, about the retention of documents that are stored in hard form and electronically.

The federal and state e-discovery rules are predicated in large part on the decision in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, a case which dealt with a litigant’s duty to preserve and produce documents and electronically stored information (“ESI”).  ESI comes in many forms.  It includes e-mail, voicemail, text messages, word processing documents, spreadsheets, websites, etc.  The duty to preserve ESI obligates a party who knows of actual or probable litigation not to destroy discoverable ESI or places where ESI is stored (e.g., hard drives, flash drives, servers, back-up tapes, etc.)  A party to a lawsuit cannot satisfy its e-discovery obligations simply by printing out hard copies of e-mails or other documents since electronic data (e.g., “metadata”) underlying an electronic document is often just as relevant as the document itself.  “Metadata” is the electronic data that can identify when a document was created, who created it, what changes or modifications to a document were made, who made those changes, when they were made, etc.

As explained in Zubulake, “anyone who anticipates being a party or is a party to a lawsuit must not destroy unique, relevant evidence that might be useful to an adversary.  While a litigant is under no duty to keep or retain every document in its possession…it is under a duty to preserve what it knows, or reasonably should know, is relevant in the action, is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, is reasonably likely to be requested during discovery and/or is the subject of a pending discovery request.”

As for the scope of evidence and ESI that must be preserved, the Zubulake court observed, “[t]he broad contours of the duty to preserve are relatively clear.  That duty should certainly extend to any documents or tangible things . . . made by individuals ‘likely to have discoverable information that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses.’  The duty also includes documents prepared for those individuals, to the extent those documents can be readily identified (e.g., the “from” and “to” fields in e-mails).  The duty also extends to information that is relevant to the claims or defenses of any party, or which is ‘relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.’  Thus, the duty to preserve extends to those employees likely to have relevant information – that is, the ‘key players’ in the case.”

Agencies should have a document retention policy in place that addresses retention of ESI.  Plus, we generally recommend that, if your agency is sued, you: (1) work with your legal counsel to develop a preservation plan related to the lawsuit; (2) immediately suspend the scheduled destruction of all documents that relate to a plaintiff’s claims (if any), and (3) preserve all ESI relating to plaintiff’s claims.

Tags: "Document Retention Policy", "Electronically Stored Information", "Zubulake v UBS Warburg LLC", E-discovery, ESI, Metadata
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Morin Jacob Morin Jacob

Morin Jacob is the Managing Partner of the firm’s San Francisco office, and is a seasoned litigator who handles all facets of defense-side employment litigation, from pre-litigation through jury trial and appeal. Morin represents Liebert Cassidy Whitmore clients on all labor and employment…

Morin Jacob is the Managing Partner of the firm’s San Francisco office, and is a seasoned litigator who handles all facets of defense-side employment litigation, from pre-litigation through jury trial and appeal. Morin represents Liebert Cassidy Whitmore clients on all labor and employment law, primarily working with Public Safety Departments, and also representing Cities, Counties, and Special Districts.

Read more about Morin Jacob
Show more Show less
Related Posts
Masks May Come Off, But Is Remote Litigation Here To Stay?
March 15, 2022
Can A COVID-19 Infection Lead To Third Party Liability For Employers?
February 15, 2022
Summary Judgment Will Be More Difficult For Employers in Whistleblower Cases After California Supreme Court Ruling
January 28, 2022

About LCW

Liebert Cassidy Whitmore is a full service employment and labor relations law firm providing expert consultation, representation, litigation, negotiation and investigation services to public agency management…

Read More....

Stay Connected

View Our LinkedIn Profile Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Us on Twitter

Archives

Topics

Related Articles

  • Tips from the Table: How to Respond to Union Requests for Information During Bargaining
  • Court of Appeal finds that the Statute of Limitations is 1 year from the discovery of each act of misconduct from an Employee
  • 2023 Legislative Session: Employment Bills to Watch
  • Public Education Agencies, Take Heed!  If You’re Not Paying Attention to SB 278 and AB 1667, You Could Be On the Hook for Repaying CalPERS or CalSTRS A Lot of Money
  • Public Safety Video Briefing: Thinking About Body Worn Cameras- February 2023

Blog Authors Show/Hide

  • Larissa Alvarez
  • Elizabeth Arce
  • Megan Atkinson
  • Steven M. Berliner
  • Richard Bolanos
  • Peter J. Brown
  • Dana Burch
  • Tony Carvalho
  • Melanie Chaney
  • Lisa S. Charbonneau
  • Kevin Chicas
  • Heather DeBlanc
  • Jenny Denny
  • Brian Dierze
  • Jenny-Anne S. Flores
  • Chris Frederick
  • Jeffrey C. Freedman
  • Adrianna Guzman
  • Troy Heisman
  • Leighton Henderson
  • Jaja Hsu
  • Katie Huber
  • Jack Hughes
  • Nathan T. Jackson
  • Morin Jacob
  • Che Johnson
  • Morgan Johnson
  • Alison Kalinski
  • Gabriella Kamran
  • Meredith Karasch
  • Paul D. Knothe
  • Erin Kunze
  • Megan Lewis
  • Stephanie Lowe
  • Savana Manglona
  • Mark Meyerhoff
  • Pilar Morin
  • Eileen O'Hare-Anderson
  • James Oldendorph
  • Brett A. Overby
  • Jennifer Palagi
  • Jennifer Puza
  • Lars T. Reed
  • Nick Rescigno
  • Jennifer Rosner
  • Daniel Seitz
  • Alexandra Seymour
  • Geoffrey Sheldon
  • Alysha Stein-Manes
  • Cara Strike
  • Ashley Sykora
  • Emanuela Tala
  • Madison Tanner
  • J. Scott Tiedemann
  • Kelly Tuffo
  • La Rita Turner
  • David Urban
  • Stefanie K. Vaudreuil
  • Stacy Velloff
  • Alexander Volberding
  • Brian Walter
  • Alex Wong
  • Oliver Yee
  • Joung Yim
  • Danny Y. Yoo
  • Michael Youril

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @lcwlegal
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore logo

California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog

Los Angeles
6033 West Century Blvd
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Phone: 310.981.2000
San Francisco
135 Main Street
7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415.512.3000
Fresno
5250 N. Palm Avenue
Suite 310
Fresno, CA 93704
Phone: 559.256.7800
San Diego
550 West C Street
Suite 620
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619.481.5900
Sacramento
400 Capitol Mall
Suite 1260
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.584.7000
View Our LinkedIn Profile Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Us on Twitter
Privacy PolicyTerms of Use
Copyright © 2023, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo