In June 2021, the Supreme Court declined an invitation to overturn Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, its seminal 1990 case holding that a facially neutral and generally applicable law survives a challenge under the Free Exercise Clause if it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. However, the
"Free Exercise"
Smith Survives – The Supreme Court’s Fulton v. City of Philadelphia Decision Does Not Alter the Free Exercise Analysis for Facially Neutral and Generally Applicable Laws
By Emanuela Tala on
Posted in First Amendment
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution includes both an establishment clause and a free exercise clause. Of these, the free exercise clause is often invoked in the employment context to challenge employer policies that, while facially neutral and generally applicable, incidentally burden religion.
In Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v.